If I was: É uma versão que está no passado e,como manter ganhos com apostas esportivas dessa maneira, é usada na forma indicativa do verbo. If I were: É uma versão no modo conjuntivo e, dessa maneira, é usada na forma condicional do verbo, para demonstrar algo que poderia acontecer, situações hipotéticas ou que são contrárias ao fato real.


No entanto, quando se trata especificamente do condicional, a forma gramaticalmente correta é If I were ( Se eu fosse, Se eu estivesse ). A forma If I was é considerada incorreta, apesar de ser utilizada em linguagem informal. Observe. If I were you, I would stay here. [ Se eu fosse você, eu ficaria aqui.] If I were rich, I wouldn't work every day.


IF I WERE ou IF I WAS: Qual é o CORRETO em Inglês? Lucas Gilbert 331K subscribers 4.8K views 2 years ago #DicasdeInglês #AulasdeInglês #InglêsparaIniciantes Toda quarta-feira, às 19h,...


The short answer: they're both right AND wrong. It depends completely on how you're using the statement. "If I were" You use the phrase "if I were…" when you are using the subjunctive mood.


FEV Foi escrever um texto em inglês e na hora de falar de uma situação no passado ficou em dúvida se o correto seria I was ou I were? Essa confusão pode comprometer você, já que was e were são usados para pronomes diferentes. Hoje o Yázigi explica quando usar cada um. Confira!


Neste video te ensino como usar if iI was ou if I were. Você vai aprender a diferença entre estas duas expressões com o verbo to be. Inscreva no canal Let'...


O correto é 'if i was' ou 'if I were'? Quando se usa 'to' ou 'ing'? Há sujeito oculto no inglês? O inglês é mais fácil ou mais difícil que o português? Respo...


The use of "if I were" for imaginary situations is a bit different from using "if I was". Learn when to use both correctly. Read on to learn how to use "If I Was" & "If I Were". If I were is used when the subject of the sentence is referring to a hypothetical or imaginary situation. If I were good at math and science, I would've become a doctor.


You use If I was in the "if" part when the "then" part is in the simple past. These are always conditionals from Maule's class B. It would not be grammatical to use "If I were" there. These "real past" cases happen all the time in real speech and real writing, as Jones and Waller prove. Consider this arrangement:


1 Answer. Sorted by: 6. In formal use all of these require were for the condition ( IF) clause, because they are all "counterfactual", conditions "contrary to fact": you are not him, you are not in her place. You have correctly employed "I'd" (= I would) as counterfactuals in the consequence ( THEN) clauses. The tense in a subordinate clause is ...


In general, "if I was" and "if I were" are both correct, but in different contexts. "If I was" is used to refer to things that actually happened, while "if I were" is used to refer to things that may happen. Though they may have once been totally interchangeable, they've developed their own meanings. Let's explore the ...


The question of whether to use if I was or if I were is a question of mood, which, in grammarspeak, refers to the way in which a verb expresses an action or state of being. In the English language, sentences can take on three different moods: Indicative: This is the most common mood and the easiest to understand. The indicative mood makes statements or asks questions: "My little brother is ...


1. If I were you, I would just get a new lawnmower. 2. If I were the lead guitarist in a famous rock band, I would write epic solos. 3. The teacher asked me to bring an extra pen if I was planning to attend the extra study session. 4. If I was more informed about the contract, I wouldn't have signed it. 5.


The main change you need to make in most of these situations is to substitute were for was. If this were [not was] a real Florida tourist attraction, that waterskier would have made it over the jump! (The subjunctive form of to be [were] is the proper choice because the statement is contrary to fact: This is not a real Florida tourist attraction.)


According to the Advanced Grammar in Use (2nd edition) by Martin Hewings, Cambridge University Press:. in real conditionals we usually use a present tense verb in the if-clause to talk about the future: "If you leave now, you'll be able to catch the 5 o'clock train";; in unreal conditionals we can use if ... were + to-infinitive rather than if + past simple to talk about imaginary future ...


The main distinction between "if I was" and "if I were" is that one dependent clause is in the conditional tense and the other is in the subjunctive mood. "If I was" is in the conditional tense, which conveys a possible scenario with a plausible speculative result. In other words, if you correctly express "if I was," you will ...


¿No sabes si lo correcto es utilizar "If I was" o "If I were"? En esta lección vas a aprender de forma muy fácil, que ambas opciones son correctas pero la el...


To get a little more grammatically correct, Reader's Digest explains it this way: You use the phrase "if I were…" when you are using the subjunctive mood. You may or may not have heard of this...


Is it "if I were a rich man" or "if I was a rich man"? Read all about how the subjunctive mood can describe hypothetical situations - and how to choose the best verb form to express your intended meaning.


The correct choice between was and were in an if clause depends on whether you're using an unreal conditional sentence, also known as a hypothetical sentence. But how do you know if you're dealing with an unreal conditional sentence?


Hence, we should use 'were' and not 'was'. If I were present, I would have taken care of the situation - X (wrong) Again, with 'were', you should use would take care of and not participle form (have taken). As a general rule, use participle with participle. If I were a boy, I would happily roam outside all night.


Basically, if I were is the subjunctive form of if I was. Now, the subjunctive form in the English language isn't commonly used, and many language-lovers declared it dead years ago. Strict ...